Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe
Slider
PublicationsCIRSE InsiderThe Global IR Summit

The Global IR Summit

October 8, 2024

Societies from nations worldwide convened to discuss the international status of IR during the Global IR Summit at CIRSE 2024.

The summit took place across two sessions on the first day of the congress. This event was designed as a companion and follow-up to the first such summit, which took place at the Society of Interventional Radiology’s meeting in Salt Lake City early in 2024.

The Global IR Survey

Prof. Constantinos Sofocleous opened the session with words of thanks to CIRSE for hosting the summit before speaking on selected results from the global IR survey which was conducted through the SIR earlier this year.

“Why did we do this survey?” he began. “The main reason is because we know that the world is not equal, and that IR services throughout the world are extremely different with a lot of disparity.”

Prof. Constantinos Sofocleous
Prof. Christoph Binkert

He explained that the United States, with about 10 interventional radiologists per million inhabitants, can be seen as the gold standard. This contrasts starkly to many other densely inhabited regions of the globe. For example, India has .43 IRs per million people, and Brazil has 1.29 per million. The lowest availability is in East Africa, with only .03 IRs per million inhabitants. “The intent of this survey was to understand the current state and common challenges of IR practices and training globally, so we can inform societies on needed efforts.”

The survey collected data on demographics, level of practice, most common procedures, modes of reimbursement, training availability, and challenges. The survey recognized creating public awareness of IR services as the most important need. It also made clear that IR exposure during radiology training is inadequate in much of the world, and that there is a universal recognition of the need for global training standards and access to education. The full survey can be viewed in JVIR.

The Global IR Statement

Prof. Robert Morgan and Dr. Parag Patel shared the stage to present for the first time the “Global Statement Defining Interventional Radiology – Have we reached the tipping point?” that has been co-issued by CIRSE and SIR. This statement is a revision of the 2010 global statement defining IR which was issued by the same two societies and endorsed by IR societies worldwide. In recognition of the increased uptake of clinical practice in IR, the need to promote the discipline, developments in certification, and need for a further call to action around the world, the path to the updated statement was launched as a joint initiative from both societies in September 2022. A final draft was circulated to national IR societies for endorsement in the summer of 2024 and 47 societies around the globe have endorsed the statement so far.

Dr. Parag Patel and Prof. Robert Morgan
 Dr. Alda Tam

The 2024 statement contains points on clinical scope and practice, training and certification, quality improvement, research, professionalism, and global goals and challenges.

Prof. Morgan read from the opening introduction of the statement: “Our global IR societies must collaborate closely to advance common strategic goals and must continue to promote the field of IR and the treatments we provide as first options for patients whenever appropriate.”

The full statement will be published jointly in CVIR and JVIR.

A focus on clinical care

Prof. Christoph Binkert opened the second session of the programme by giving an update on CIRSE’s vision for the future of interventional radiology.

CIRSE’s vision consists of three pillars: A focus on clinical services and patient care, a focus on therapies and treatment, and a focus on training and excellence in IR. The driving point of Prof. Binkert’s CIRSE presidency, which concluded at the end of CIRSE 2024, was clinical services and patient care. “I think this is the most critical part,” he stated, “If we master that part, all of the other parts will naturally fall into place.”

Under Prof. Binkert’s tenure, a clinical services in IR task force  was established; a survey on clinical practice was sent to all CIRSE members (with results presented during the meeting); levels of clinical services infrastructure were defined; educational materials, such as CIRSE Academy courses and webinars on clinical practice, were published; a clinical service slide deck was created; and a social media campaign focusing on clinical IR every Tuesday was established. An IR leadership meeting with representatives of CIRSE’s European group member societies was initiated and will be repeated. Additionally, every day at CIRSE 2024 featured at least one session on clinical care.

The next step of the CIRSE vision honing in on therapies and treatment will be the focus of Prof. Philippe Pereira’s presidency. Prof. Binkert pointed out that a good first step in this direction is amplifying the call for IRs to dedicate as much of their time as possible, and in an ideal case 100% of their time, to providing IR treatments rather than splitting their workday between diagnostic and IR work. “If we can do this, we double our force in a very short time. This could be realistic.” Prof. Binkert feels that the last step, training and excellence in IR, can fall into its rightful place only after the first two points are well-implemented.

SIR President Dr. Alda Tam took the stage with a presentation called “Focus on clinical evaluation and longitudinal care of patients by IR physicians,” which gave a reflection on the SIR’s strategy in the US by which the American IR community achieved specialty status for interventional radiology

American interventional radiologists fought for an independent specialty by presenting the changes and shifts that IR has undergone to the American Board of Specialties. They argued that IR is a unique skill set, the procedural complexity has increased, and that longitudinal patient management has become an essential responsibility of IR physicians. “How we convinced the American Board of Medical Specialties was our argument that better trained IRs lead to better patient care,” Dr. Tam stated.

She presented action items; from training items to pathways to curricula, American IRs had to rework every aspect of their approach in the endeavour for specialty status. These actionable items, collected from interviews with more than 70 IRs, trainees, and support staff across the United States, were compiled in an article titled “Opportunities for Excellence in Interventional Radiology Training: A Qualitative Study.” She pointed out that, independently, SIR and CIRSE have come to the same conclusions as to which areas to prioritize.

Dr. Tam read out a quote from the paper: “The word ‘clinic’ and the word ‘clinical’ are just the same as the word ‘car’ and ‘cart’, three letters similar, both modes of transportation, but very different.”

“I think we need to be more specific about what it means to be clinical.” She said, “I think it would be an interesting point to either solidify that definition across the globe, or actually include more details on how we can all get to an appropriate clinical schedule.”

She ended with strong words: “A clear and concise message is one that cannot be lost in translation. IR practice must be synonymous with clinical evaluation and longitudinal care. Part of these sessions, the global summit, the global statement, is to engage the leaders around the world in IR to get to this point.”

Views from the audience

The presentations during the summit evoked a variety of thoughtful and insightful comments from the multi-national audience.

“In my practice, I’ve given up talking about procedures themselves to the public.” stated Dr. Denis Szejnfeld, SOBRICE President, “I talk about the disease … nobody knows about fibroid embolization, just those who are looking for it… I just say minimally invasive, for fibroids, for enlarged prostates, and then the patient can clearly see if it’s for them or not.”

Prof. Sofocleous added – “We are not enough people to be everywhere… but we should really control imaging after a procedure, for at least a year if not longer. For my cancer patients, I see them all for five years.” He reiterated that talking to patients about the disease itself is important, and seeking out patient alliances for specific diseases can be an important way to increase reach.

Prof. Binkert echoed the first two comments and expanded on them. “Once you start referring patients to others … you do this a couple of times and this goes miles. Suddenly you are not the enemy, you are a colleague, and they think twice about trying to “kill” you because you send patients to them. To use hard language, referring patients is an extremely strong weapon in this turf battle.”

Dr. Tam said that she also does not hesitate to refer to other specialties, and that it has lead to her performing a lot more combination cases with colleagues from neighbouring specialties. “I think this is important, because the imaging equipment no longer belongs to us. The ORs of the future are going to have everything that we have in our room … if we’re not in the mix, or part of the team, I think you’re going to see a lot more “turf” problems…the more I’m in there helping ortho, or doing a lung procedure, the more we are continually sharing patients and doing the best thing for the patient.”

A paediatric IR from the United States shared her unique challenge in this realm: “A lot of people aren’t necessarily paediatricians becoming interventionalists, and I don’t always know what the clinical comfort level is with managing them outside of that. I’ve found that collaboration and working with our hospital and services has been the best way to manage our paediatric patients. I’m both; I was a paediatrician before I was an interventionalist, and I can see that there are a lot of gaps to fill, but this is the right direction.”

Prof. Morgan pointed out that not everybody is able to practice clinically, and opened the floor for comments from physicians experiencing barriers to clinical practice in their countries.

Dr. Sheyla Carolina Alfaro Ita of Peru shared that she had only started an outpatient clinic in her hospital last year, after facing great default with management telling her that radiologists should not have consultations and remain only diagnostic. Having won consultations, she is now trying to get beds for IR-exclusive procedures.

Prof. Bien Soo Tan spoke about his experience in Singapore, where his department is the only stand-alone interventional radiology department in the country. “The expectations of residences rotating through us are very different, because when they go to another residency rotation, the clinical aspect is not so intense. They seem to think that the experience of IR is mainly about being in the procedure room and not seeing patients in the ward. The journey is hard, but we need to work at every single aspect to win everybody over, because this is the way to go.”

Dr. Fabian Gaupp, a Yale physician and co-founder of Road2IR who has worked in Tanzania added a unique perspective: “There can actually be an advantage if you start from scratch, because then you can build things the way you think it should be done. Actually, in Tanzania they do a much better job [at clinical practice] than we do at some hospitals in the US. They have IR clinic all day every day.”

A doctor from India pointed out the constant pressure that funding issues pose globally, especially with regards to training, and in particular when larger international organizations such as the WHO don’t yet seem to have interventional radiology on their radar.

“Every continent has the same problems” stated Dr. Ajit K Yadav, ISVIR Secretary, “But every continent has different types of practice and different medical guidelines. The questions we are asking are uniform globally, but we have different diversities in our practice and guidelines.” He explained that it is proving difficult to detach interventional radiology from radiology in India, in spite of good guidelines, and that countries facing an extreme lack of training and patients who cannot pay for treatments are not in the same position as countries who are advanced enough to be able to focus on topics such as SOPs and standardizing training. “Every solution is not fit to every country.”

At the end of the session, Dr. Riddhi Borse, a trainee from Mumbai who has trained at Yale and is now at MGH in Boston, expressed her wish to add a voice from the next generation to the conversation. “The beauty of this conversation is that it lays out so many different models. Although each country and each area have their own nitty-gritties, the beauty of it is that in some parts of the world everything clicks and creates magic. To be able to have access to the blueprint and then to replicate that … saying it worked at x so it might work at y, even having access to these ideas is, I believe, the success of this global summit.”


Both parts of the Global IR Summit at CIRSE 2024 are available to watch on demand via the CIRSE Library, and similar meetings are being planned for the future.